Friday, January 20, 2006

Analysis: GOP Re-Embraces Maverick McCain

Republicans also turned to McCain, the occasional party maverick with the gold-plated reformer's resume and a demonstrated appeal to independent voters. GOP leaders covet that appeal as they look ahead to fall elections that will test their grip on power.

"Obviously, when you're looking at the issue of congressional reform, the first person you turn to in the United States Senate is John McCain, and we've done so," said Sen. Rick Santorum (news, bio, voting record), R-Pa.
...
Not that many years ago, Republicans were furious at the Arizona senator for his ceaseless, and ultimately successful, efforts to pass legislation designed to reduce the impact of big money on politics.

The high command in the House was doubly angry, fuming that the McCain briefly used the office of the Democratic leader as a base of operations to secure the votes of GOP rebels needed for final passage. The legislation had been at the core of McCain's unexpectedly strong campaign for the Republican presidential nomination in 2000, when he drew heavy support from independent voters and swamped candidate George W. Bush in the leadoff New Hampshire primary.

We here are always glad when someone like Senator McCain is given the limelight. He is a good and faithful servant of his constituency and the American people. I for one wouldn't be a bit mad at him if he told these people who turned their backs on him in spades to take a flying f*ck at a rolling doughnut. However, John McCain is also loyal to his party. Even though they essentially cast him out and called him crazy in 2000.

His integrity is why we like him. But wouldn't it be nice if just once he really hit back?

Here's hoping they really listen to him and this isn't some cheap stunt for the mid-term election cycle.

Thursday, January 19, 2006

Ralph Reed's Ties to Abramoff May Slow His Run at GA Lt. Gov

From the article:
"We believe that Ralph wants to be president. The only place to stop him is right now," says former state senator Greg Hecht, the leading Democrat in the race.

Sorry, I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.

One would think that the social moderates/fiscal conservatives of the Republican Party would never let that happen but they don't really control the party right now.

The very stench of corruption surrounding anyone can hurt in politics. As it should. However, in Ralph Reed's case I can only hope it is true.

EDIT: a further quote that gives insight to the Repubican Party as it stands right now
It's unclear whether Reed's link to Abramoff will turn off Christian voters. Sadie Fields of the Georgia Christian Coalition, says Reed will get a warm welcome when he and Cagle appear before the group Saturday.

"He has apologized for any disappointment anyone might have felt over Abramoff," she says. "It's time to move on."

She probably sent Jimmy Swaggart a check after his "I have sinned" speech too.

Monday, January 16, 2006

Under The Radar

I just found this today. It is an article from the New York Times that says that just hours after signing the defense bill and with it the torture ban into law the White House issued a Presidential statement which said, "...the administration would interpret the amendment "in a manner consistent with the constitutional authority of the president to supervise the unitary executive branch and as commander in chief and consistent with the constitutional limitations on judicial power." In other words, I may have signed it but I didn't mean it and I will take that sh@t under advisement.

Obviously, Senator McCain and others who vociferously supported the bill and the torture ban in particular are not happy.

Is this a case, yet again, of the President trying to make the Executive Branch have undue power and is it legal? John Dean, former White House counsel to President Nixon, asks that question.