John Dean Blasts Warrantless Eavesdropping

Partial text:

By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - Nixon White House counselor John Dean asserted Friday that President Bush's domestic spying exceeds the wrongdoing that toppled his former boss from power, and Sen. Orrin Hatch (news, bio, voting record) snapped that Democrats were trying to "score political points" with a motion to censure Bush.

"Had the Senate or House, or both, censured or somehow warned Richard Nixon, the tragedy of Watergate might have been prevented," Dean told the Senate Judiciary Committee. "Hopefully the Senate will not sit by while even more serious abuses unfold before it."

Testifying to a Senate committee on Wisconsin Democratic Sen. Russell Feingold's resolution to censure Bush, Dean said the president "needs to be told he cannot simply ignore a law with no consequences."...

"To me, this is not really and should not be a partisan question," Dean told the panel. "I think it's a question of institutional pride of this body, of the Congress of the United States."

It's good to see that a voice of experience understands what is going on here. If the Senate doesn't want to censure the President fine. However, I think it is necessary that Congress ensure that the balance of power remains.

Consumer Group challenges constitutionality of bill

As previously mentioned on this blog the President signed a bill that the House and Senate passed different versions of. It seems there is now a second lawsuit regarding the bill.

Consumer Group Challenges Deficit Law

Sorry, no text. It's late and your mouse works so go ahead and click the link.

It's official! The Dems don't have all the nuts...

PROVIDENCE, R.I. - Republican Senate candidate Stephen Laffey once told a newspaper columnist that God wanted him to run for mayor of Cranston.

He spent $2,000 to soundproof his mayoral office because of fears people were eavesdropping.

And when journalists noticed he had digitally erased a former friend from photographs on his campaign Web site, he suggested aliens were to blame.(Full text)

1,889 days and no vetoes: Bush gaining on Jefferson

By Richard Benedetto, USA TODAY Thu Mar 23, 7:02 AM ET

President Bush Thursday becomes the longest-sitting president since Thomas Jefferson not to exercise his veto, surpassing James Monroe.

Monroe was in office 1,888 days before he vetoed his first bill on May 4, 1822, a measure to impose a toll on the first federal highway. Jefferson never exercised his veto during two terms in 1801-09.

Thursday is Bush's 1,889th day in office, and no veto is in sight. As of Wednesday, Congress had sent him 1,091 bills. He signed them all.

Bush came close to a veto last month when Congress threatened to block a deal to turn over operations at ports in six states to a company owned by the Arab emirate of Dubai. He threatened a veto, but he avoided a showdown when the Dubai company decided to sell that part of its business to American interests.

"After that, we're not likely to hear a veto threat from him that much again," says G. Calvin Mackenzie, government professor at Maine's Colby College.

Some analysts say Bush's failure to use his veto shows an unwillingness to confront fellow Republicans who control Congress. "He doesn't want to fight battles unnecessarily and create a distance between himself and his party," says Mark Rozell, a George Mason University political scientist who has studied presidential vetoes.

Others say Bush's avoidance of the veto is a sign of strength. "Bush and his party are so close on most issues that there's no need to veto," Mackenzie says.

Rep. Rahm Emanuel (news, bio, voting record), D-Ill., scoffs at that: "This is a rubber-stamp Congress. Why would he veto anything?"

Still others say it is a matter of Bush's management style. "He's a CEO kind of guy. He gives his orders, delegates the negotiating to others and is willing to live with the outcome," says Robert McClure, a political scientist at Syracuse University's Maxwell School.

Bush has used veto threats to shape bills more to his liking. For example, the House wanted $370 billion for last year's highway bill; the Senate, $318 billion. Bush drew the line at $256 billion, then compromised at $286.4 billion, more than he wanted but far below the House and Senate levels.

Bush said Tuesday that the veto threat has helped him reduce the rate of domestic spending: "One reason why I haven't vetoed any appropriation bills is because they met the benchmarks we've set."

Come on George let's set a record!

BTW, are you allowed to pat yourself on the back for meeting benchmarks when you have a single discretionary spending project, which is quickly bordering on long term, that is now in the neighborhood of $280 billion?

We the Morons

Click the title above and be treated to a witty and insightful rant by Marty Kaplan about the Democratic party's bungling. Though the real crux is how people are more informed than ever and want to take a stand however, moderate Republican's(*taps fingers on desk waiting for Adam to respond*) feel as though their party abandoned them and Democrats who feel as though now is the time to strike scream into the wind as people like Harry Reid and Joe Lieberman sit on their hands.

US Government urges Congress to raise debt limit

WASHINGTON (AFP) - The US government appealed to Congress to raise the national debt limit by the end of this week or face a potential shutdown of federal operations for lack of cash.

"It's really the week this must be done because the Congress will be out of session at the end of this week," Treasury spokesman Tony Fratto told reporters.

Treasury Secretary
John Snow has issued increasingly urgent warnings to Congress that the statutory debt limit of 8.184 trillion dollars is fast-approaching, and that the government will then lose its borrowing power.

Last week, Snow said new issues of federal debt instruments would only raise enough cash to keep government operations financed until mid-March.

"I must advise you that the Treasury has now taken all prudent and legal actions to avoid reaching the statutory debt limit," Snow wrote in a letter to senior Republican and Democratic members of Congress.

"I therefore strongly urge Congress to pass a debt limit increase immediately."(full text by clicking title)

So, what happens if the debt limit isn't raised? All non-essential federal government operations will have to shut down. So, no Social Security, no HUD, you get the picture.

Just how out of control is this? The U.S. Federal Debt was around $5.5 trillion in 1997 and remained virtually unchanged through September of 2001.(Source) Then we went on an unprecedented spending spree while at the same time cutting taxes. For a little more perspective the Federal debt increased $3.1 trillion from 1980 - 1992. It has increased more than that in the last 5 years, going from $5.6 trillion to $8.8+ trillion.

Yes, there is some evidence here that it has to do with the party in control of the White House but it goes deeper than that. We as citizens have to call on our leaders to have a plan. Currently the plan is cut taxes and hope that the economy goes through the roof to pay the bills. Sounds nice. However, you can't spend money like a drunken sailor in the process. (No offense meant to our fine men and women in the U.S. Navy.) You have a chance to speak in November.

George Clooney: I am a Liberal. There, I said it.

From The Huffington Post.com
I am a liberal. And I make no apologies for it. Hell, I'm proud of it.

Too many people run away from the label. They whisper it like you'd whisper "I'm a Nazi." Like it's dirty word. But turn away from saying "I'm a liberal" and it's like you're turning away from saying that blacks should be allowed to sit in the front of the bus, that women should be able to vote and get paid the same as a man, that McCarthy was wrong, that Vietnam was a mistake.

And that Saddam Hussein had no ties to al-Qaeda and had nothing to do with 9/11.

This is an incredibly polarized time (wonder how that happened?). But I find that, more and more, people are trying to find things we can agree on. And, for me, one of the things we absolutely need to agree on is the idea that we're all allowed to question authority. We have to agree that it's not unpatriotic to hold our leaders accountable and to speak out.

That's one of the things that drew me to making a film about Murrow. When you hear Murrow say, "We mustn't confuse dissent with disloyalty" and "We can't defend freedom at home by deserting it at home," it's like he's commenting on today's headlines.

The fear of been criticized can be paralyzing. Just look at the way so many Democrats caved in the run up to the war. In 2003, a lot of us were saying, where is the link between Saddam and bin Laden? What does Iraq have to do with 9/11? We knew it was bullshit. Which is why it drives me crazy to hear all these Democrats saying, "We were misled." It makes me want to shout, "Fuck you, you weren't misled. You were afraid of being called unpatriotic."

Bottom line: it's not merely our right to question our government, it's our duty. Whatever the consequences. We can't demand freedom of speech then turn around and say, But please don't say bad things about us. You gotta be a grown up and take your hits.

I am a liberal. Fire away.

House to see if Bush can find his pen

Bush Faces GOP Effort to Stop Ports Deal By LIZ SIDOTI, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - His presidency already at a low point,President Bush now faces a GOP move in Congress to stop a plan he steadfastly supports: a Dubai-owned company's entry into U.S. port operations.

House Republicans have united around legislation that would block DP World from taking over significant management of terminals at six U.S. ports, ignoring a veto threat from the president.

"We are going to send a very clear signal that we want to have American interests secured by leaders in America," said Rep. Jerry Lewis (news, bio, voting record), R-Calif.

His House Appropriations Committee planned to attach the legislation Wednesday to a $91 billion measure for states recovering from Hurricane Katrina and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Offering few specifics, Lewis said only that his legislation would not single out any one country or company but would effectively prevent DP World from operating U.S. port terminals.Full text

Brilliant! I am sure that some folks at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue just had a coniption. It is about time that Congress, especially the Republicans, started acting like they have a spine and not a rubber stamp committee.

For the record, I am opposed to any foreign government having control of US ports etc. I am not saying Nissan shouldn't own land in Tennessee to make trucks. I am saying Japan shouldn't own the Nashville airport. There is a huge difference. Think of it this way: Imagine the backlash in Dubai if it were announced that the United States government would now be solely in charge of their airports.

Save Yourself for Kinky!

Kinky Friedman, author/musician/frequent Don Imus guest, is running for Governor of Texas as an Independent. God bless him.

Is Texas ready for Governor Kinky?

By John Whitesides, Political Correspondent Mon Mar 6

HOUSTON (Reuters) - The line of well-dressed young executives stretches down a hallway, past a table of Kinky Friedman talking action figures and straight up to the candidate for Texas governor in the black cowboy hat.

"I'll sign anything," country singer and mystery novelist Kinky Friedman assures the crowd arriving for a downtown luncheon speech as they snap up Kinky T-shirts, bumper stickers and posters sold to finance his independent -- and decidedly nontraditional -- bid for governor.

With a blizzard of one-liners, a campaign slogan of "Why the Hell Not?" and an eclectic blend of policy ideas from all sides of the ideological divide, the former frontman for the band Kinky Friedman and the Texas Jewboys says he wants to "change the world one governor at a time."

Friedman hopes to tap voter frustration with Republican Gov. Rick Perry, Texas Democrats and politics in general to become the latest celebrity governor, following wrestler Jesse Ventura in Minnesota and actor
Arnold Schwarzenegger in California....

"I just want Texas to be number one in something other than executions, toll roads and property taxes," Friedman says. But if he loses he promises to ditch Texas and head to Hawaii.

"If I lose this race I will retire in a petulant snit," he said. "I'm not going to go out gracefully, I promise you."Full Text

Amen to that!

At 75, Gorbachev Laments U.S. 'Arrogance'

Just a little perspective. And a catch up with one of the 20th Century's most important politicians.

From the Seattle Post Intelligencer:

By VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV
MOSCOW - Mikhail Gorbachev's magnetic brown eyes shine as brightly as ever, and he speaks with the same passion about the collapse of the Soviet Union as he prepares to mark his 75th birthday on Thursday.

The man who ended the Cold War and launched democratic reforms that broke the repressive Soviet regime continues to enjoy the limelight, globe-trotting on behalf of his political foundation and environmental group and taking part in charity projects.

At a meeting with foreign reporters this week, Gorbachev blamed the United States for losing a chance to build a safer and more stable world following the Soviet demise.

"Ending the Cold War was given as a gift" to the United States, but it only strengthened its arrogance and unilateralism, he said. "The winner's complex is worse than an inferiority complex, because it's harder to cure."

While praised worldwide, Gorbachev has been reviled at home, where a majority of Russians hold him responsible for the Soviet breakup and subsequent economic chaos that impoverished millions.

He won a mere 1 percent of the vote in the 1996 presidential election; he hasn't run since.

Many still accuse him of caving in to the West. Anatoly Utkin, a senior researcher with the U.S. and Canada Institute, chastised Gorbachev for drastically cutting Soviet nuclear arsenals and agreeing to Germany's reunification without getting anything in return.

"Gorbachev didn't know the West. And the West didn't trust the nobility of his motives and coldly used him," Utkin said in a column in the weekly Argumenty i Fakty.

Gorbachev's record as a man who gave freedom to his land also was tarnished by some darker pages.

One was his handling of the 1986 reactor explosion at the Chernobyl nuclear plant, which the Soviet leadership announced to the world only after scientists in Sweden detected a radioactive fallout.

Gorbachev insisted the Kremlin just didn't know the scope of the disaster, but many claim the Soviet leadership deliberately downplayed its gravity.

He is also blamed for a Soviet troop crackdown on demonstrators in Lithuania in 1991 that killed 14 and injured nearly 1,000.

Gorbachev said the troops were sent against the protesters in Vilnius on a secret KGB order of which he was unaware - a claim his foes shrugged off as improbable.

Gorbachev still bristles when he talks about the betrayal by his communist lieutenants who launched the August 1991 coup that briefly ousted him. The coup collapsed within days, encouraging the Soviet republics to declare independence and shattering Gorbachev's hopes of keeping them together in a looser federation.

Former Russian President Boris Yeltsin, who celebrated his 75th birthday in February, recently accused Gorbachev of having advance knowledge of the coup and waiting it out to see who would win.

"Yeltsin is a liar," Gorbachev snapped, rejecting the allegation as "sheer nonsense."

Looking back at the turmoil that preceded his resignation, Gorbachev says he has never regretted his refusal to turn to military force to prevent the Soviet collapse. He said that sometimes his "hands were itching" to use force, but he realized that could have led to a civil war and even a global nuclear conflict.

Gorbachev said this week that while he could have ended Yeltsin's political career easily by dispatching him as ambassador to a distant country, he didn't do so because such a move would compromise his principles.

Yeltsin humiliated Gorbachev by giving him just a few hours to clear out of the presidential office after he signed the Soviet Union out of existence on Dec. 25, 1991. He never invited him to the Kremlin afterward.

Gorbachev's relations with the Kremlin have seen a marked improvement under Vladimir Putin, whom he has praised repeatedly for ending the political chaos and economic decline of Yeltsin's era.

Despite his age, Gorbachev seems as lively and energetic as before, giving the impression of genuinely enjoying life. "I like good dishes from all over the world. I have tasted them all and I still can't name a favorite," he said.

He rarely touches a fiction book, but reads a lot of history, philosophy and political science.

"I also watch a lot of movies, mostly on TV. I have gotten sick of (American) blockbusters and love Russian movies," he said.

Bush threatens veto

President Bush has threatened to veto any bill that blocks the deal with Dubai Ports World to take control of operations of six sea ports on the East Coast.

Who else thinks Congress ought to do it just to see if he can actually find his pen?

After all, it has been 5 years and he hasn't yet.

Party On!

Who's spending big now? The 'party of small government' Tue Feb 21, 7:19 AM ET

Say you're in a financial hole. You're spending more money than you're taking in - $4,000 this year alone. After much effort, you figure out ways to save $400 in the next five years. Would you then turn around, spend double that amount and put yourself deeper in debt?

Probably not - unless, that is, you were a member of Congress running for re-election this year and you get to spend other people's money. Add eight zeros to the numbers in the example above, and you'll get an idea of the shell game going on in Washington.

The federal budget deficit will be in the range of $400 billion this year. That means roughly $1 in every $6 spent by the government will be borrowed money. So a few weeks ago, with great self-congratulatory fanfare, Congress passed and the president signed what was billed as a $40 billion, five-year deficit reduction. Now Congress is weighing tax-cut packages that would wipe out those projected savings almost twice over.

The House of Representatives already has passed a five-year, $70 billion package of goodies that focuses on extending reduced rates for those taxpayers who have dividend and capital-gain income. The Senate pushed through a similarly unaffordable plan. President Bush is seeking to make permanent all of his 2001 tax cuts, some of which are set to expire.

In truth, Uncle Sam doesn't have the money to do any of this...Full text

Following the logic of the example at the beginning of this article you would then be $19,600 in debt after five years assuming that your income neither increases nor decreases.

Regardless, of your opinions about where government money should be spent and how much the point of this is that you either spend borrowed money like a drunken sailor or you don't. You can't claim to be the party of small government and fiscal conservancy and spend money like this.

I think it is time we bring back some good old fashioned gridlock to Washington. Bill Clinton gets a lot of credit for running a balanced budget during his tenure. But some of that credit goes to the fact that he had a Republican Congress for the last 6 years. Everyone was forced to make choices. We don't need a Constitutionally questionable line item veto to balance the budget. We need Congress and the President to actually not be so in love with one another that everything is rubbered stamped and damn the cost.

People think that gridlock in Washington is bad. They are wrong. Red tape is bad. But gridlock is not red tape. Gridlock means the next President might not have to raise taxes.

Sen. Mike DeWine, said what?

I found this over at Think Progress.

The White House stated today that it is backing a legislative proposal by Ohio Sen. Mike DeWine to exclude Bush’s NSA wiretapping program from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. ThinkProgress has previously reported why the proposal is a bad idea. Tonight, on Fox News, DeWine himself explained his motivations behind the proposal:

"You know, there’s been some controversy about whether or not this program is legal or is not legal. I think we need to get beyond that. And the vast majority of American people believe these calls need to be listened to. But we don’t want to have any kind of debate about whether it’s constitutional or not constitutional. So I think we need to put that beyond us." Full post

Further reading.

Excuse me Senator but this is exactly the kind of thing we should be having a National debate about. That means Congress, the President, the Supreme Court and the American people. And to think, I would have had an opportunity to support a candidate who had a chance of defeating DeWine in Ohio - until this week.

How come we got treated to semen stains on Monica's dress for 3 months but we can't have a debate about the constitutionality of a government spy agency violating its charter by order of the President who was possibly abusing powers that possibly shouldn't have been granted to him in the first place? Oh, right. Semen is better television.

House GOP Won't Revisit Flawed Budget Bill

WASHINGTON - A clerk's mistake could mean a budget bill
President Bush signed isn't technically law, but congressional Republicans said again Wednesday they have no plans to try to fix the problem.

Even though Alabama attorney Jim Zeigler has filed a lawsuit charging the $39 billion deficit-cutting legislation Bush signed is unconstitutional because the House and Senate failed to pass identical versions, House GOP leaders insist there's no problem.

"I believe that it's law," said House Majority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Mo.

Not so, says Zeigler, a Republican activist.

"An eighth-grader in civics class knows that a bill cannot become law unless the identical bill passes the House and Senate and is signed by the president," Zeigler said.

Okay as usual these days the guys in Congress are having a little bit of trouble reading the Constitution. Just because you meant to pass the same bill doesn't mean you did.

If the Supreme Court even has to hear this one as it should not get out of the Federal Court in Mobile, AL(read the article) everyone should be beyond upset. You know, because Congress is actually considering violating the Constitution. Maybe when they figure this out they can go back and fix their other violation. The one that granted President Bush wartime powers but Congress never declared war.

May the people who did this

be eviscerated in print and talk radio.

Paul Hackett is ending his candidacy for U.S. Senate in Ohio.

Apparently, behind the scenes players in his own party, the Democrats, hounded him to drop out. May those that did this rot. It would have been nice if they would have actually let the primary process start.

I am thoroughly disgusted.

More opinion: Paul Rieckhoff, Gary Hart

Cheney 'Authorized' Libby to Leak Classified Information - National Journal

Hey, yeah, I'm still alive, and yes, I actually post to blogs once in a blue moon.

All kidding aside, this sounds like it's pretty damning. Is Dick Cheney the new Spiro Agnew?

National Journal - Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis (Scooter) Libby, testified to a federal grand jury that he had been 'authorized' by Cheney and other White House 'superiors' in the summer of 2003 to disclose classified information to journalists to defend the Bush administration's use of prewar intelligence in making the case to go to war with Iraq, according to attorneys familiar with the matter, and to court records.

Libby specifically claimed that in one instance he had been authorized to divulge portions of a then-still highly classified National Intelligence Estimate regarding Saddam Hussein's purported efforts to develop nuclear weapons, according to correspondence recently filed in federal court by special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald.

Beyond what was stated in the court paper, say people with firsthand knowledge of the matter, Libby also indicated what he will offer as a broad defense during his upcoming criminal trial: that Vice President Cheney and other senior Bush administration officials had earlier encouraged and authorized him to share classified information with journalists to build public support for going to war. Later, after the war began in 2003, Cheney authorized Libby to release additional classified information, including details of the NIE, to defend the administration's use of prewar intelligence in making the case for war.

Heeeerrre's Tommy!

Yes, folks he is back! Although he has a court date pending with regard to corruption charges for his PAC in Texas and he still could get in some more hot water depending on what Jack Abramoff says when he spills the beans(pun intended), the House Republicans have given Tom DeLay a seat on the House Appropriations Committee. In addition, he scored a seat on the House Justice sub-committee. Yes, the committee that helps oversee the Justice Department. The one that is investigating Jack Abramoff.

DeLay Lands Coveted Appropriations Spot
By ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - Indicted Rep. Tom DeLay, forced to step down as the No. 2 Republican in the House, scored a soft landing Wednesday as GOP leaders rewarded him with a coveted seat on the Appropriations Committee.

DeLay, R-Texas, also claimed a seat on the subcommittee overseeing the Justice Department, which is currently investigating an influence-peddling scandal involving disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff and his dealings with lawmakers. The subcommittee also has responsibility over NASA — a top priority for DeLay, since the Johnson Space Center is located in his Houston-area district.Full tex

In an odd twist, DeLay is taking the spot of fellow Republican Randy Cunningham of California. Mr. Cunningham resigned from his seat because he is currently awaiting sentencing for bribery and tax evasion.

The Primaries are coming! The Primaries are coming!

Sorry, not trying to scare you.  Those primaries are still 2 years away.  Which means people will start throwing their hats in next year.  In the meantime...

There are 435 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives up for election in 2006.  Is your district one of them?

Don't know which district you live in?  Well, you can try here or looking on your voter registration card may help.

Maybe among these we can find 5 or 6 that are worthy of endorsement.

If you find someone that is worthy of us taking a look at please email us.

Senators Question Gonzales on NSA Wiretaps

By KATHERINE SHRADER, Associated Press

WASHINGTON - Senators raised doubts about the legal rationale for the Bush administration's eavesdropping program Monday, forcing Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to provide a lengthy defense of the operations he called a vital "early warning system" for terrorists.

A handful of Republicans joined Democrats in raising questions about whether
President Bush went too far in ordering the National Security Agency's monitoring operations. The senators were particularly troubled by the administration's argument that a September 2001 congressional resolution approving use of military force covered the surveillance of some domestic communications.

"The president does not have a blank check,(emphasis mine)" said Judiciary Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., who wants the administration to ask the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to review the program.

"You think you're right, but there are a lot of people who think you're wrong," Specter told Gonzales. "What do you have to lose if you're right?"

Well, Senator if you think the administrative branch of government might be abusing its powers, do something about it. For starters you can renig the "war time" like powers Congress illegally gave him in the first place.

I am calling upon Congress to stop playing around in committee and take back some of their Constitutional resposponsibility. However, this is an election year. No way, it happens.

Um, It's Unconstitutional Too

This isn't really a post-mortem on the SOTU from last night. This is more a point of order from last night's speech. Which I didn't watch. I know how irresponsible of me. But I can hardly listen to the President for 5 minutes let alone listen to him butcher the English language for nearly 2 hours.

Then there's the spending issue.

The president said, "I am pleased that members of Congress are working on earmark reform," a comment which caused Sen. John McCain to clap and bounce his head like Goofy on crack. "And we can tackle this problem together, if you pass the line-item veto.

No, Mr. President. We can tackle this problem if you would just use the veto power you ALREADY possess. You have yet to veto a single spending bill, including that earmark-loaded Porkapalooza highway bill last summer. You didn't need a line-item veto to erase the Bridge to Nowhere. All you needed was a Bic pen. You could have borrowed mine.More from Human Events

First I will tackle the quote. Mr. President, The United States Supreme Court already declared the line item veto to be unconsitutional. Bill Clinton had use of the line item veto from 1997 - 98 until the Justices got a chance to rule. The majority, 6 - 3, opinion stated: "there is no provision in the Constitution that authorizes the president to enact, to amend or to repeal statutes". In other words, if Congress passes a law or bill you, Mr. President, have to sign all of it or veto it.

Which leads us to the second point in the article snippet above, from a self-proclaimed Conservative publication by the way, President George W. Bush has never vetoed a single spending bill in 5 years. Mr. President I appreciate the fact that you don't, or at last say you don't, want bills loaded up with pork for special interests - like bridges to islands in Alaska that have 50 people living on them - so do your job. Veto the bill. Make Congress rewrite it without the pork.

I know lots of people who wish they could only pay taxes or have their federal income taxes used for certain things - mine would go to arts, education, roads and job training - however that is not the way the laws are written. We pay taxes. Congress decides how to spend them.

So, Mr. President here is The Constitution of The United States of America which you have sworn to uphold. Read it. Love it. Careful though, there might be some stuff in there about wiretapping that you might not like.